Introduction

How Galileo used the QS AI Capability Self-Assessment to transform scattered AI initiatives into a strategic roadmap

Case study
22 July 2026
How Galileo used the QS AI Capability Self-Assessment to transform scattered AI initiatives into a strategic roadmap
"The framework helped us to focus on the state of our AI initiatives."

Downlaod
QS Placeholder Image

Like many higher education institutions, Galileo Global Education Italia had embraced AI as a strategic priority. However, despite having an AI strategy in place, the institution faced a common problem: AI initiatives were emerging across departments without coordination.

Like many higher education institutions, Galileo Global Education Italia had embraced AI as a strategic priority. However, despite having an AI strategy in place, the institution faced a common problem: AI initiatives were emerging across departments without coordination.

"At the beginning, we did have an AI strategy, but we realised that many initiatives were emerging across departments without a coordinated approach," explains Fabio Siddu, Chief Transformation Officer.

Without a structured framework, the institution lacked visibility into:  

  • Which AI tools were already being used across the organisation
  • The maturity level of existing AI efforts
  • Untapped opportunities for AI application
  • A clear roadmap for prioritising AI investments

How the QS AI Capability Self-Assessment brought structure

Galileo turned to the QS AI Capability Self-Assessment to bring structure to their AI journey. The process provided a systematic approach to evaluate AI readiness across the institution.

"The framework helped us to focus on the state of our AI initiatives, giving us a structured way to navigate a complex topic and focus on what really mattered. Through the self-assessment process, we mapped our existing AI powered tools identifying processes that could benefit from AI, collected documentation to formalise and promote the adoption of these tools. "

Other key activities during the assessment included:

  1. Process Identification: Pinpointed processes that could benefit from AI integration
  1. Documentation: Formalised and promoted adoption of existing AI tools
  1. Maturity Assessment: Evaluated the development stage of each AI initiative
  1. Gap Analysis: Uncovered new application areas not previously considered
  1. Roadmap Development: Defined short- and medium-term AI priorities

Building responsible AI governance

A critical outcome of the QS AI Self-Assessment was the establishment of a robust AI governance framework. Galileo recognised that responsible AI adoption demands clear policies and stakeholder accountability, an opinion echoed by global academics and students.

The institution developed:

  • Regulatory Framework: Clear policies aligned with compliance requirements
  • Code of Conduct: Ethical guidelines for AI use
  • Data Security Protocols: Data classification and protection measures
  • Role-Based Responsibilities: Defined rules for students, faculty, and staff
  • Risk Assessment Processes: Structured evaluation of AI-related risks
  • Audit & Compliance: Ongoing processes to ensure transparency and accountability

"To foster responsible AI experimentation and adoption, we focused first on putting a solid governance framework in place," notes Siddu.

From pilots to deployment  

Following the assessment, Galileo strategically focused their AI efforts on high-impact areas:

Student Recruitment & Conversion

AI tools deployed to optimise the admissions funnel and improve conversion rates.

Real-Time Student Support

Interactive live avatars providing 24/7 assistance for academic, administrative, and personal needs.

Administrative Process Automation

AI-powered sentiment analysis for student questionnaires to improve service delivery.

Institution-wide understanding of AI is key

One of the most significant revelations from the self-assessment was the importance of communication in AI transformation.  

"The main takeaway from the QS AI Self-Assessment is the confirmation that communication is a must, especially in wider impact innovation processes like AI. Innovation without communication remains a personal development that the companies can benefit from only partially."

Looking ahead, Galileo recognises that AI literacy across all stakeholders is essential and that cross-departmental communication accelerates adoption.

"In 5 years, everybody will have AI supporting their business-as-usual activities,” Siddu said. “Those who will exploit it collectively across every level of the organisation and for different stakeholders are those who will gain a competitive advantage."

Results and outcomes

Through the QS AI Capability Self-Assessment, Galileo achieved:

✓ Complete visibility of AI initiatives across all departments

✓ Structured governance framework for responsible AI use

✓ Clear short- and medium-term AI roadmap

✓ Prioritised project portfolio focused on high-impact areas  

✓ Enhanced cross-departmental communication and collaboration

✓ Foundation for sustainable, institution-wide AI transformation

View the QS World Future Skills Index series
Get more insights

Accordion title

Content goes here

Accordion title

Content goes here

Accordion title

Content goes here

Accordion title

Content goes here

What could the framework reveal for you?
Learn how the QS AI Capability Framework and Assessments can help you map activity, identify capability gaps and establish clear priorities for progress.
Request information