QS higher education insights library

The QS World University Rankings® celebrated its 10-year anniversary, prompting a research project to understand how prospective international students use rankings. The report reveals that employment prospects are the primary motivation for students when consulting rankings. Key findings include the preference for global and subject-specific rankings over national ones, and the importance of employability, teaching quality, and student experience in their evaluation of universities.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject 2015 has been released, featuring a record 36 disciplines. This ranking is based on the insights of over 85,000 academics and 41,000 employers, analyzing millions of research papers and citations. Harvard and MIT dominate the top spots, while UK universities have improved their standings. Notably, new disciplines have emerged, with institutions like London Business School and the Royal College of Art leading in their respective fields. For the complete rankings, visit TopUniversities.com.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject International Forum will take place in Sydney from March 16-18. This event is designed for higher education stakeholders interested in university evaluations by discipline. Experts from various fields will gather to discuss the new subject rankings. Registered delegates will receive a sample ranking for their chosen subject. Don't miss the chance to participate in these important discussions—register by March 15!

The fifth edition of the QS World University Rankings by Subject is approaching, promising to be the most comprehensive analysis of university achievements at the subject level. This year, six new subjects, including Business, Dentistry, and Veterinary Science, have been added, bringing the total to 36. These rankings will provide insights into the quality of teaching and research across various disciplines, reflecting the growing importance of these subjects in global education.

The inaugural QS ranking of universities in Eastern Europe and Central Asia showcases Lomonosov Moscow State University as the leading institution, followed by Charles University and Novosibirsk State University. With 28 countries represented, the ranking highlights the region's focus on enhancing higher education and research. Notable ancient universities like Tartu and Jagiellonian also feature prominently, alongside newer institutions from Turkey making significant strides. This report outlines the indicators used for ranking and the ambitions of various countries to improve their global standings.

The QS World University Rankings reveal the competitive nature of European higher education, with ETH Zurich and EPFL leading the charge. This report discusses the performance of various institutions across Europe, including notable entries from Germany, France, and the Netherlands, while also addressing the impact of the 2008 financial crisis on university systems. The findings suggest that viable university systems can thrive without significant student debt, attracting international talent and producing world-class research.

The QS World University Rankings for 2014/15 indicate that while Asia boasts many excellent universities, they still fall short compared to top institutions in Europe and North America. Japan leads with ten universities in the top 200, including the University of Tokyo at 31st. Tsinghua University emerges as China's top institution at 47th, while Indian universities struggle to improve their standings. Singapore and Hong Kong also feature prominently, showcasing their strong higher education systems.

The QS World University Rankings have generated significant media attention, with MIT securing the top position for the third consecutive year. UK universities, including Cambridge and Imperial College London, closely follow. The rankings reflect a growing emphasis on STEM research, with notable mentions of global leaders receiving briefings on the results. This year saw a record number of UK universities in the top 30, highlighting their strong performance in global education.

Join us for the launch of the QS World University Rankings on September 16th in Prague during the EAIE Conference. This event will review the past decade of rankings, feature a panel discussion with esteemed speakers, and celebrate this year's results. Enjoy complimentary coffee and drinks while securing your free spot at this limited-capacity event!

On September 16, 2014, the QS World University Rankings marked its 10th Anniversary. The event featured a presentation by Ben Sowter, Head of the QS Intelligence Unit, highlighting key insights and developments in university rankings. This significant milestone showcases the evolution of the QS rankings and their impact on global higher education.

The latest QS World University Rankings for universities under 50 years old showcases the growing influence of Asian institutions, particularly Nanyang Technological University, which has taken the lead. This report highlights the absence of European universities in the top five for the first time, alongside the rise of technological universities. The rankings reflect significant changes as several institutions reach the 50-year mark and drop out, allowing new entrants to gain visibility.

The World University Rankings methodology employs six robust measures to evaluate global higher education institutions. This report details the unchanged measures for the 2015/16 rankings, improvements made in data usage, and the significance of academic and employer surveys. It also discusses the faculty-to-student ratio, internationalization indicators, and the normalization of citations to ensure a fair assessment across various disciplines.

The 2015/16 QS World University Rankings reaffirm MIT's position as the world's top university, with notable shifts in rankings for other institutions. Imperial College London has dropped to eighth place, while the London School of Economics has risen significantly. Asian universities, particularly in Singapore, have also made impressive gains, showcasing the evolving landscape of global higher education.

This article discusses the latest global rankings of the most innovative universities, as published by Thomson Reuters. It highlights the metrics used to evaluate innovation, including patents and academic papers, and reveals that US universities dominate the top spots. Stanford University leads the ranking, followed by MIT and Harvard. The article also compares these findings with previous rankings by Times Higher Education, showcasing the differences in methodology and results.

The QS World University Rankings have been released, marking a significant methodological change. This article explores the rankings, subject area results, and upcoming international events discussing university performance and innovation in education.

The QS World University Rankings by Faculty provide a stable comparison of university standings, unaffected by recent methodological changes. This year, Oxford has overtaken Harvard in Arts and Humanities, while MIT continues to lead in Engineering and Technology. The rankings highlight the consistent performance of universities like Cambridge and Stanford, alongside notable achievements from institutions like Johns Hopkins and New York University.

The twelfth edition of the QS World University Rankings is now online, featuring important updates to the methodology. Key changes include a new approach to measuring academic paper citations, which aims to balance the influence of different academic disciplines. This year, over 76,000 academics and 44,000 recruiters contributed to the rankings, enhancing their reliability and consistency. The adjustments are designed to provide a fairer comparison of universities globally, particularly benefiting those with strengths in the Arts and Social Sciences.

This edition of Higher Education World is the largest yet, showcasing QS's regional university rankings for the Arab region, Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. It also evaluates national education systems and reports on the EduData Summit in London. Additionally, readers are encouraged to participate in the Wharton-QS Stars Reimagine Education competition, which offers significant funding and visibility for innovative educational projects.

In a historic meeting, President Pranab Mukherjee received the QS Asian Rankings briefing, marking a significant moment for India's engagement in global higher education. The briefing, conducted by key figures from the QS University Rankings Executive Board, highlighted India's progress with six universities entering the Asian top 300. The discussion emphasized the need for Indian universities to actively participate in global rankings to enhance their international standing.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's recent remarks at a conference highlight the importance of foreign students in defining the success of Japanese universities. He expressed disappointment over the decline in Japanese students studying abroad and proposed government support to enhance international experience. The QS Asian University Rankings reveal modest positions for top Japanese institutions, with a call for improvement in international faculty and student numbers. UK universities showcased their historical ties with Japan, emphasizing the depth of their connections.

The Indian government is taking a keen interest in QS rankings as it seeks to develop a ratings system for its universities. President Pranab Mukherjee has expressed concern over the absence of Indian universities in the top global rankings, urging for a change in this scenario. The government is encouraging collaboration with QS to improve the international standing of Indian institutions.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject emphasize Cambridge, Massachusetts as a global academic hub, showcasing Harvard and MIT's dominance in various fields. Harvard excels in life and social sciences, while MIT leads in engineering and technology. The rankings also reveal a diverse range of institutions worldwide achieving top spots in specific disciplines, challenging the traditional dominance of the big names.

The QS Top 50 Under 50 ranking reveals a strong dominance of Asian universities, with the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology leading the list for the second consecutive year. This report discusses the implications of this trend, the universities that have dropped out due to age, and the dynamic nature of university rankings in the context of global higher education.

The QS Top 50 Under 50 rankings for 2014 will be released next week, showcasing universities established within the last 50 years. With significant changes expected due to the age of some institutions, this ranking aims to highlight the achievements of younger universities competing against their older counterparts. The rankings season will continue with the QS World University Rankings by Subject next month, promising to reveal more insights into institutional performance.

This article discusses the evolution of the BRICS countries in the context of higher education, highlighting their collaboration with UNESCO and the upcoming QS BRICS University Rankings. It examines the significant impact of these nations on the global supply of university graduates and the challenges they face in providing quality education for all.

QS is preparing to release its first bespoke ranking for universities in the BRICS countries, which include Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. This new ranking will feature specific measures tailored to these nations, allowing for valid comparisons among universities. Over 400 institutions have been assessed, with only the top 100 set to be published. The methodology will emphasize academic reputation while collaborating with local educational authorities to encourage participation.

The QS Apple conference in Seoul attracted over 600 attendees, marking a significant event for higher education leaders. With a diverse agenda featuring nearly 150 presentations, topics ranged from internationalisation to new university establishments. Keynote speaker Dr. Chang-Gyu Hwang emphasized the evolving role of universities in a tech-driven future. The event fostered community and trust among delegates, highlighting the importance of partnerships in higher education.

In 2013, QS World University Rankings added 106 new universities, marking a significant expansion in their evaluation process. This report discusses the implications of including more institutions, the challenges of ranking performance, and the ongoing commitment to providing insights into the global higher education landscape. The average change in rankings among top universities has shown improvement, despite the addition of new entrants, raising questions about the balance between inclusivity and stability in university rankings.

Sultan Qaboos University has seen a decline in its QS World University Rankings from 377 in 2011 to 501-550 in 2013. This drop is attributed to a decline in academic reputation, the inclusion of over 100 new institutions, and a data error from 2011. Despite the ranking drop, the university has made genuine improvements in its faculty-student ratio. QS emphasizes transparency and is working with the university to clarify these changes.

The QS World University Rankings® 2013-14 were unveiled on September 10, 2013, during a seminar in Istanbul. This year marks the first disclosure of the top 800 universities, with over 3,000 institutions considered. Highlights include insights from the QS Global Academic Survey and the QS Stars ceremony, where seven universities received their ratings. The event gathered 200 delegates and showcased the latest trends in global higher education.

The 2013 Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) has been released, showcasing Harvard's continued dominance at the top. Significant changes include the University of California, Berkeley moving up to third place, while ETH Zurich enters the top 20. This report highlights the performance of universities globally, noting the absence of Asian institutions in the top ranks for the first time.

The QS World University Rankings 2013/14 highlight the resilience of global higher education post-2008 financial crisis, showing a steady increase in international students and shifts in university rankings. Notably, Asian institutions are rising, with Korea and Singapore making significant gains, while traditional European universities struggle to maintain their standings. This report delves into the evolving landscape of higher education and the implications for students and institutions alike.

The QS World University Rankings 2013-14 confirms MIT as the top university globally for the second year in a row, with Harvard and UK institutions also performing well. The rankings show a growing trend of international students favoring top universities, reflecting a premium on quality education. The stability of the rankings is notable, with minimal movement among the top institutions, providing valuable insights for prospective students.

The QS Intelligence Unit will be at booth 442 during the EAIE Conference in Istanbul from September 11-13. Attendees can pick up the QS World University Rankings® 2013/14 supplement, receive invitations to exclusive events, and meet the team of experts. Don't miss the chance to participate in a competition for an iPad and learn more about QS services.

This article explores the question of which five universities are considered the best in the world. It discusses how perceptions of top institutions have evolved over time, influenced by personal experiences, cultural references, and the availability of information. The author reflects on their own university selection process and invites readers to share their opinions on the top universities, emphasizing the importance of rankings and reputation in today's educational landscape.

The QS World University Rankings® 2013/2014 have been released, with updates to the faculty area tables that now align with the QS World University Rankings by Subject methodology. This announcement addresses common questions regarding significant movements in the rankings and highlights the improved approach to comparing global universities based on subject areas.

Ben Sowter, head of the QS Intelligence Unit, discusses the necessity of transparency in university rankings in a new Unesco book. The book features insights from various academics and rankers, addressing the complexities of global rankings and their implications for students and universities. Sowter argues that while rankings are valuable tools, they cannot fully capture the nuances of university performance and individual preferences.

This content features an embedded video related to the QS World University Rankings. It provides links to the full results available on the Top Universities website and offers a downloadable supplement for the 2015 rankings, which includes detailed insights into university performance.

This content provides an overview of the QS University Rankings for Latin America, detailing the top institutions and insights into their performance. It highlights Brazilian universities' dominance and includes links for free downloads in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The report also outlines key contents, such as the top 250 universities and unique evaluation tools.

The QS ranking of universities under 50 years old has seen the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) rise to the top position, overtaking the University of Warwick. This report highlights the performance of young institutions, including Nanyang Technological University and the emergence of new entrants like the Hong Polytechnic University. With 29 universities moving up in the rankings, the report provides insights into the evolving landscape of higher education.

Join the conversation about QS World University Rankings by using the hashtag #qswur. This content encourages engagement on Twitter, where users can find and share tweets related to global education and university performance.

On May 16, 2013, QS Quacquarelli Symonds announced that it is the first organization to receive the IREG Approved label for its university rankings. This recognition comes after a thorough audit process by the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG), ensuring that QS's rankings are compiled with transparency and professionalism. The approval applies to the QS World University Rankings, QS University Rankings: Asia, and QS University Rankings: Latin America, and will last until December 31, 2016.

The QS advisory board plays a crucial role in advising on university rankings, focusing on methodologies and their global impact. Led by Martin Ince, the board includes esteemed members from universities and organizations worldwide, such as RMIT University, Paris Science et Lettres, and the University of Hong Kong. This diverse group of experts collaborates to enhance the understanding and effectiveness of university rankings.

The QS World University Rankings have sparked widespread interest, with over two million accesses following their recent release. MIT has claimed the top position for the first time, while universities worldwide react to their standings. Social media engagement has surged, reflecting the rankings' importance to students, particularly international ones. Coverage spans from the UK to India, highlighting varying perspectives on university performance and reputation.

This content discusses the release of the 2013 QS World University Rankings by Subject and introduces a series of videos that explain the methodology behind the rankings. The first video highlights the Top 10 Universities in Computer Science, providing insights into how the rankings are determined.

This article discusses the significant innovations in university rankings, particularly the introduction of regional comparisons by QS. It highlights the upcoming Latin American and Asian rankings, which focus on key indicators relevant to these regions. The piece also examines the implications for universities, especially in terms of research investments and international ambitions.

The QS World University Subject Rankings have been released, showcasing evaluations of over 2,500 universities across 30 subjects. This year's rankings are the most extensive yet, incorporating new metrics such as academics' H Index. Harvard leads in 10 subjects, while MIT excels in seven. The rankings aim to assist prospective students in making informed decisions based on their specific academic interests.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject has expanded to cover 30 disciplines, providing a comprehensive comparison of top universities worldwide. This year's rankings incorporate feedback from 70,000 academic experts and employers, highlighting the leading institutions in various fields. Notably, US and UK universities dominate the top spots, while Asian institutions excel in engineering and technology. The report also discusses the performance of European and BRIC nations, revealing a competitive landscape in global higher education.

The QS World University Rankings® is a highly respected ranking system that relies on extensive academic surveys. This content discusses the methodology behind the rankings, including the measures taken to ensure the validity of survey responses and prevent manipulation. It outlines strict policies for participation, anomaly detection algorithms, and the importance of academic integrity, emphasizing the robustness of the survey with over 46,000 responses.

The QS University Rankings: Asia has been released, showcasing the top universities in the region. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology retains its top position, followed by the National University of Singapore and the University of Hong Kong. The rankings highlight the international appeal of these institutions, particularly in terms of student and faculty diversity. Japan and Korea also show strong performances, while Indian universities face challenges in global competitiveness. This report provides insights into the evolving landscape of higher education across Asia.

The Academic Reputation Index and Employer Reputation Index are crucial for the QS World University Rankings. These indices help evaluate universities internationally and are integral to regional rankings and QS assessments. Stakeholders, including academics and employers, are invited to participate in surveys to enhance the quality of these evaluations. Since 2010, over 20,000 faculty members and 6,000 employers have contributed to this important process.

QS is set to release the World University Rankings by Subject for the third time, now more detailed than ever. The 2013 rankings will introduce agriculture and forestry as a new subject, reflecting the growing importance of these fields. With a total of 30 subjects covered, the rankings will also incorporate a new measure, the H-index, to enhance the evaluation of university performance based on research output and citations.

This article discusses the significant influence of world university rankings on higher education, detailing how they affect university strategies and student choices. It highlights the differences between the Shanghai and QS rankings, exploring their methodologies and the representation of global higher education. The analysis provides insights into the geographical distribution of highly ranked universities and the implications of these rankings in the context of a knowledge-based economy.

The 2013 Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) was released on August 15th, 2013, by Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Harvard University leads the rankings, with eight US universities in the top 10. Notably, UC Berkeley has risen to third place. For detailed results and methodology, visit the provided link.

Discover the QS World University Rankings evaluations guide, designed for students and careers advisors. With a global readership of over 40 million, this guide offers insights into QS rankings, helping users choose study destinations and evaluate universities effectively. The contents include various rankings and evaluations, making it a valuable resource for anyone involved in academic counseling.

Since 2004, the QS World University Rankings have been instrumental in helping students identify the top universities globally. This content provides access to the latest rankings, including detailed scores and classifications for each institution. Users can download the data in MS Excel format, which includes various metrics such as academic reputation, employer reputation, and more.

This article delves into the QS World University Rankings, focusing on the top universities in the US, including MIT, Harvard, and Stanford. It compares the strengths of institutions on the East and West Coasts, exploring their unique characteristics and contributions to higher education, particularly in STEM fields. The discussion highlights the impressive roster of universities in both regions and considers the cultural and educational implications of their rankings.

The QS World University Rankings for 2012/13 reveal the stability and shifts among top universities. With MIT overtaking Cambridge and notable changes in Asian institutions, the rankings provide valuable insights into university performance. Toronto's rise and Edinburgh's decline illustrate the competitive landscape, while the data from extensive surveys ensures reliability. This report discusses the implications of these rankings for students and education professionals.

Since 2005, QS has published reputational rankings in five core faculty areas alongside the QS World University Rankings®. Based on responses from 48,000 academics, these rankings provide insights into universities producing world-leading research. Harvard University ranks first overall, excelling in multiple faculty areas, while institutions like MIT and University of California, Berkeley also showcase strong performances. The rankings highlight a greater geographic diversity of high-performing universities, with notable achievements from institutions worldwide.

The 2012/13 QS World University Rankings reveal a historic increase in international students at top universities, with a 10% rise among the top 100. This trend is driven by demand for quality education, particularly from Asia. The article explores the reasons behind this mobility, including the rise of branch campuses and the advantages of a global mindset for students and host countries.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject 2017 has been released, providing insights into the top-ranking institutions across various subjects. Harvard University leads with 15 top-ranked subjects, followed by MIT with 12, and the University of Oxford with 4. The report also highlights other institutions from the USA, UK, Switzerland, and more, showcasing their strengths in specific fields. For a comprehensive look at the results, check out the full university ranking.

The QS World University Rankings have generated significant reactions on Twitter, with various countries experiencing notable changes. The USA continues to dominate the top spots, while Finland, Pakistan, Switzerland, Hong Kong, and Indonesia have made impressive gains. Conversely, the UK and Ireland have seen declines. Surprising results from China and discussions surrounding Brexit add to the conversation. Join the dialogue and share your thoughts on this year's rankings!

The QS World University Rankings® 2016/17 reveals significant shifts in global university standings. The US solidifies its dominance with MIT, Stanford, and Harvard taking the top three spots. Meanwhile, Western European institutions face declines, while universities in Russia and South Korea rise due to increased investment. Asian universities, particularly in China, also show improvement, with Singapore leading the region. Despite challenges, Latin America celebrates a top-100 institution for the first time in a decade.

The QS World University Rankings® 2016-2017 have been released, showcasing 916 institutions from 81 countries. MIT retains its position as the world's top university, followed by Stanford and Harvard. Notably, South Korea and Russia have made significant gains in the rankings, while Western European institutions have seen declines. This year's rankings highlight the impact of funding on university performance and include the first top-100 institution from Latin America since 2006.

The QS World University Rankings® 2016/17 are here, featuring over 3,800 institutions and more than 900 ranked universities from 81 countries. This year's rankings are more comprehensive than ever, with significant methodological updates. Key indicators include academic and employer reputation, student-to-faculty ratio, and international ratios. Stay informed about the upcoming release in September by signing up for the mailing list!

The QS Top 50 Under 50 rankings reveal a significant shift in higher education, with East Asian universities taking the lead. This year's top six includes Nanyang Technological University and The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. The report discusses the implications of these rankings and highlights the prominence of STEM-focused institutions.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject for 2018 have been released, showcasing the standings of universities in 46 subjects. This year's rankings include four new subjects: Anatomy, Hospitality and Leisure Management, Sports-related Subjects, and Theology. The report highlights the top institutions for each subject and discusses trends in global higher education, including the performance of universities in Europe, North America, and emerging regions.

This article discusses the QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings, highlighting the top 50 countries for higher education. It outlines the criteria used for ranking, including system strength and access to universities. The United States ranks first, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. The article also mentions other notable countries and emphasizes the impact of internationalization and politics on rankings.

This article examines the University of Reading's claim of being in the top 1% of universities globally, as highlighted in the QS World University Rankings and a BBC report. It discusses the complexities of university rankings, the number of higher education institutions worldwide, and the methodology behind these rankings, providing insights into how universities can substantiate their marketing claims.

The QS World University Rankings for 2018 are set to be released next week, with significant changes to the rankings cycle aimed at providing clarity. This announcement discusses the new timeline for rankings, including the move of the QS World University Rankings to June and the implications for data collection and university performance. Discover how universities are ranked and what changes have occurred in the latest rankings.

The 14th edition of the QS World University Rankings will be published in the first full week of June, marking a significant change from the traditional September release. This decision aims to provide potential students ample time to utilize the rankings. The 2017 rankings will maintain the six criteria used previously, with an important update to the citation metrics to enhance the validity of findings across various academic fields.

QS is expanding its role in higher education beyond rankings, announcing an earlier release of the QS World University Rankings. This edition also previews the EduData Summit and discusses a new partnership with Enago to support researchers with English as a second language.

This article discusses the QS University Rankings for Emerging Europe and Central Asia (EECA), highlighting the challenges faced by universities in the region. It outlines seven key strategies for improving university rankings, including enhancing collaboration, publishing research in English, and increasing international engagement. The piece emphasizes the importance of building a strong university brand and creating industry connections to boost academic reputation.

The QS Top 50 Under 50 2015 has been released, showcasing the world's top universities established in the last 50 years. Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore ranks first, followed by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and KAIST from South Korea. This year's edition also introduces the 'Next 50 Under 50', highlighting emerging institutions. The report emphasizes the dominance of Asian universities in the rankings and the growing recognition of young institutions globally.

In 2015, QS published a series of reports and rankings through its platforms, TopUniversities.com and TopMBA.com, aimed at aiding prospective students in their decision-making process. Highlights include the QS World University Rankings by Subject, QS Regional Rankings, and insights into MBA ROI. The content provides valuable information on university performance and student experiences.

The QS World University Rankings 2018 have been released, highlighting significant changes in global university standings. MIT retains its top position, while UK institutions face a decline, with only the University of Cambridge in the top five. This report discusses the implications of political changes on higher education and presents key findings from the rankings.

The QS World University Rankings 2015 has generated significant buzz on social media, particularly on Twitter. Universities like MIT, which ranked No. 1 for the fourth consecutive year, and the University of Southampton, which climbed 13 places, are among those celebrating their achievements. The London School of Economics also made headlines by ranking second in social sciences. This year's rankings have been a hot topic for news outlets and educational institutions worldwide.

The QS World University Rankings® 2015/16 has sparked discussions in the higher education community, with a focus on the perspectives of students. While institutions celebrate their rankings, students' voices remain crucial yet often unheard. This report highlights the initiative launched by QS to understand how students use and perceive rankings, starting with focus groups in Europe and expanding globally. Discover insights and get involved in this important conversation.

The QS World University Rankings for this year show notable shifts among top universities, with MIT retaining its number one position. The rankings highlight the dominance of US and UK institutions, while ETH Zurich stands out as the top university in Europe. Asian universities also made significant gains, with institutions like the National University of Singapore climbing the ranks. This year's methodology changes have allowed universities like the London School of Economics to showcase their strengths more effectively.

The 2015 QS World University Rankings has introduced several new universities, including the Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, which ranked 147th, making it the highest-ranked university in India. Other newcomers include Université de Montpellier and CentraleSupélec, both resulting from recent mergers. This article explores their growth, academic focus, and the impact of these rankings on higher education.

The 12th edition of the QS World University Rankings showcases significant movements among leading universities. Nanyang Technological University (NTU) has made remarkable gains, climbing to 13th place, while the London School of Economics (LSE) jumped 36 spots to 35th. Conversely, Imperial College London fell from 2nd to 8th due to changes in ranking methodology. This article explores the reasons behind these shifts and the implications for higher education.

The QS World University Rankings 2015/16 have revealed the top 10 universities in the world, with MIT taking the top spot for the fourth consecutive year. Harvard University follows closely in second place, while the University of Cambridge and Stanford University share the third position. This report highlights the rankings, academic reputations, and unique characteristics of each institution, providing insights into the world of higher education.

This year's QS World University Rankings introduces new methodology refinements aimed at providing a fairer reflection of universities' research impact. Key indicators include employer reputation and citations per faculty, with significant changes in how citations are assessed. The rankings will normalize scores across major fields of study, giving institutions a chance to improve their standings. Explore the full rankings and follow updates on Twitter.

The QS World University Rankings will unveil new methodology refinements on September 15, aimed at providing a fairer reflection of universities' research impact. Key changes include a normalized total citation count that balances the influence of different academic fields, addressing the current advantages held by institutions strong in life sciences. This announcement highlights the importance of equitable assessment across diverse disciplines, ensuring a more accurate representation of research contributions.

This article examines the evolution of international university rankings and identifies five major challenges that rankings providers will face in the coming decade. Key issues include the need for better assessment of teaching quality, more data on employment outcomes, and the demand for subject-specific rankings. Additionally, students seek more supplementary information and personalized interfaces to aid in their decision-making process. The insights are based on focus groups and surveys conducted with current and prospective students.

This report investigates how prospective students and their parents use university rankings to inform their choices. It highlights their motivations, preferences for global and subject-specific rankings, and how these rankings influence their decisions regarding studying abroad and improving employment prospects.

India's 78th Independence Day highlights the importance of higher education institutions in shaping society. This article discusses the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), its role in evaluating universities, and its significance in fostering competition and innovation. With a focus on the top institutions and their contributions to global rankings, the piece emphasizes the need for continuous improvement in education quality as India aspires to enhance its global stature.

This report delves into the performance of French universities in the QS World University Rankings: Europe 2025, emphasizing their strong employer reputation and graduate employability. With 49 institutions ranked, France showcases significant improvements in key metrics, particularly in employability and research. Notable institutions like Université PSL and Sciences Po lead in various categories, while challenges in sustainability remain. The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of higher education in France.

In a recent symposium, Dr. Ashwin Fernandes discussed how higher education institutions can prepare for the next generation of students. Key strategies include embracing change, providing holistic education, and fostering lifelong learning. The QS World University Rankings play a crucial role in helping institutions align their curricula with industry demands. This article explores the essential factors that make universities future-ready and the importance of innovation, diversity, and sustainability in education.

The Middle East is becoming a significant player in global higher education, with 81 universities ranked in the QS World University Rankings 2024. Experts at the QS Higher Ed Summit discussed the diverse student demographics and the need for universities to adapt their offerings. They emphasized the importance of interpersonal skills and innovative teaching methods, as well as the role of research in societal development. This article explores these themes and the future of higher education in the region.

QS is proud to announce its inclusion in Newsweek’s Top 100 Most Loved Workplaces in the UK, based on employee sentiment and satisfaction. CEO Jessica Turner emphasizes the importance of creating a thriving environment for employees, which has led to significant growth and impact. The recognition reflects the collaborative spirit and commitment of the QS team. Key factors contributing to this accolade include systemic collaboration, a positive vision for the future, respect, and alignment of values, all aimed at fostering a supportive workplace.

The March 2023 edition of QS Insights Magazine is now available, featuring a range of topics including QS Subject Rankings, the risks associated with predatory journals, and insights into New Zealand's new Prime Minister's education plans. Additionally, it explores public perceptions of higher education in the UK, highlights the journey of Dwana Franklin-Davis in tech, and discusses the future of higher education in India.

The QS Online MBA Rankings 2023 have been released, showcasing the top business schools in Europe based on their online MBA programs. This year's rankings feature new entrants, notable improvements from previous years, and highlight regional performances. The University of Warwick and IE Business School share the top position, while several institutions have made significant strides. The rankings provide insights into the highest performing online MBA programs across Europe, making it a valuable resource for prospective students.

The QS International Trade Rankings 2023 have been launched, assessing universities on their ability to prepare students for careers in global trade. The top institution is Arizona State University, followed by notable schools from New Zealand, Singapore, and the UK. The rankings evaluate key areas such as programme content and graduate outcomes, with the US leading in representation among the top institutions.

For higher education institutions, collecting and utilizing data can be a significant challenge. This article provides three top tips to enhance data-driven capabilities: establishing standardized data definitions, maintaining a centralized register of data sources, and automating manual processes. By addressing these obstacles, universities can improve their strategic decision-making and operational efficiency.

This article examines the distress and financial hardship caused by students not completing their degree courses in the UK. It highlights various reasons for non-continuation, including the impact of the pandemic and mental health issues. The piece also discusses innovative strategies universities are implementing to support at-risk students, such as AI-assisted monitoring and the creation of centralized support services.

The US is home to some of the world's most prestigious universities, but the coronavirus pandemic has raised concerns about the future of higher education. With a significant drop in first-year student enrollment and unique challenges faced by institutions, the sector is at a crossroads. This article explores the impact of COVID-19 on US universities, the rising costs of education, and the potential for innovative solutions to emerge in response to these challenges.

This article explores the necessary approaches to enhance innovation and performance in European higher education institutions. It highlights the correlation between advanced education and economic growth, discusses key initiatives introduced by the European Commission, and emphasizes the importance of both bottom-up and top-down strategies in educational reform.

This article discusses the importance of supporting university staff during the COVID-19 crisis. It highlights the need for mental health resources, ongoing training, and flexible work arrangements to ensure staff well-being and productivity. The piece emphasizes the significance of continuous feedback and support, as well as the necessity of adapting to new tools and systems to meet the evolving challenges faced by higher education institutions.

This article emphasizes the importance of ethnic diversity in higher education institutions and the barriers that hinder progress. It presents statistics from the UK, US, and Australia, illustrating the lack of representation among academic staff. Key issues include leadership diversity, inadequate training, and recruitment biases. The article calls for universities to examine and address these systemic barriers to foster a more inclusive environment.