The 2015 #QSWUR on Twitter

Access the QS Global MBA 2026 data in spreadsheet format, and assess and analyse the data offline.

This article delves into the QS World University Rankings, focusing on the top universities in the US, including MIT, Harvard, and Stanford. It compares the strengths of institutions on the East and West Coasts, exploring their unique characteristics and contributions to higher education, particularly in STEM fields. The discussion highlights the impressive roster of universities in both regions and considers the cultural and educational implications of their rankings.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject 2017 has been released, providing insights into the top-ranking institutions across various subjects. Harvard University leads with 15 top-ranked subjects, followed by MIT with 12, and the University of Oxford with 4. The report also highlights other institutions from the USA, UK, Switzerland, and more, showcasing their strengths in specific fields. For a comprehensive look at the results, check out the full university ranking.

The QS World University Rankings for Global MBA, Master's, and Career Specialisation 2023 have been released, showcasing the top business schools worldwide. Stanford Graduate School of Business leads the Global MBA Rankings, followed by Harvard Business School and Wharton School. The report also highlights the best Master's programs in various fields, including Management, Finance, and Business Analytics, with HEC Paris and MIT consistently performing well. Additionally, the rankings provide insights into career specialisations, revealing trends in consulting, entrepreneurship, and technology.

The QS World University Rankings will unveil new methodology refinements on September 15, aimed at providing a fairer reflection of universities' research impact. Key changes include a normalized total citation count that balances the influence of different academic fields, addressing the current advantages held by institutions strong in life sciences. This announcement highlights the importance of equitable assessment across diverse disciplines, ensuring a more accurate representation of research contributions.