.jpeg)
QS Global MBA Rankings 2027: How has global MBA performance changed over five years?
.png)
26 October 2026
Insights
Capabilities
Conferences
QS Global MBA Rankings 2027: How has global MBA performance changed over five years?
The QS Global MBA Rankings 2027 highlight shifts in global business education between 2023 and 2027. While US business schools continue to lead the rankings, institutions across Europe, Asia and the Middle East have recorded notable changes in performance.
The 2027 edition ranks 423 MBA programmes across 73 locations. North America has the largest representation with 156 programmes, followed by Europe (113) and Asia (81).
Analysis of five editions reveals changes in country-level performance, growing competition among leading MBA programmes and the importance of return on investment, employability and reputation in ranking outcomes.
How has competition among leading MBA programmes changed?
Despite movement across the rankings, the highest-performing MBA programmes remain relatively stable.
In 2027, 25 programmes achieved Elite performance status, with overall ranking scores of 85 or above out of 100. A further 27 were classified as Leading performers, scoring between 70 and below 85. Together, these 52 programmes represent just 12.3% of the ranking.
However, there have been some changes among the highest-ranked institutions.
Oxford Saïd Business School and Chicago Booth entered the global top 10, replacing Northwestern Kellogg and Columbia Business School.
Toronto Rotman, the University of Hong Kong, Georgia Tech and Johns Hopkins also entered the top 50.
Across the 374 returning programmes with comparable annual ranks, 68 improved their positions, 119 declined and 187 remained unchanged.
The five-year trends highlight a competitive MBA landscape in which established institutions retain significant advantages, while improvements in financial value, employability and reputation continue to influence ranking performance.
For business schools, demonstrating strong graduate outcomes, international employer recognition and a competitive return on investment remains important for strengthening their global position.
Which countries lead the QS Global MBA Rankings 2027?
The United States continues to lead the QS Global MBA Rankings, with 130 ranked programmes in 2027. Of these, 19 feature in the global top 50 and 33 in the top 100.
MIT Sloan School of Management rises from third to first place, while Harvard Business School retains second. Stanford Graduate School of Business climbs one position to third, overtaking the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, which falls to fourth.
Competition at the top remains close, with the 10 highest-ranked MBA programmes achieving overall scores between 95.9 and 100.
However, five-year ranking data reveals a more nuanced picture of US performance.
Among programmes with comparable results across all five editions, the US recorded an average decline of 27.9 ranking places between 2023 and 2027. Despite this, its average ranking percentile improved by 8.2 points.
As the rankings expand, institutions can fall in numerical position while improving their relative standing. The results suggest that US business schools have maintained their competitive strength despite increasing international competition.
Which countries have improved their MBA ranking performance?
While North America remains the largest region in the rankings, several other locations have recorded improvements over the past five years.
Among locations with at least three programmes included in the five-year comparison, the United Arab Emirates recorded the strongest average improvement between 2023 and 2027, gaining 25.7 ranking places and 25.9 percentile points.
Italy and Switzerland also recorded positive long-term movement.
The latest annual results highlight further changes in global MBA performance.
Between 2026 and 2027, Hong Kong (SAR) recorded the strongest average ranking improvement among locations with at least three comparable programmes, gaining 6.6 places. Four out of five programmes improved their positions.
South Korea followed with an average improvement of 4.3 places, while Canada gained 2.7, Switzerland 2.5 and France 2.4. The UK also recorded a positive average movement of 1.1 places.
These results highlight improvements across several established and emerging MBA markets, demonstrating how competition extends beyond the highest-ranked US institutions.
Why have Chinese and Indian MBA programmes declined in the rankings?
Five-year ranking data reveals declining performance among several MBA programmes in China and India.
Between 2023 and 2027, programmes in China (Mainland) recorded an average decline of 78.2 ranking places and 5.9 percentile points among those with complete five-edition data.
India recorded an average decline of 70.4 ranking places and 3.4 percentile points over the same period.
Between 2026 and 2027, China (Mainland) recorded an average decline of 7.2 ranking places, with none of its 12 programmes in the annual movement analysis improving. India recorded an average decline of 4.3 places.
Several MBA programmes in China and India experienced significant falls. India's IIM Calcutta dropped 31 places to 95th, while China's Peking University Guanghua School of Management declined by 21 places and Fudan University by 20.
The analysis identifies Value for Money as a major contributor to these changes, rather than a consistent decline across all areas of performance.
IIM Calcutta's Value for Money score fell by 25.6 points, while three Chinese business schools also recorded declines: China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) by 28.9 points, Peking University, Guanghua School of Management by 19.2 points and Fudan University by 18.2 points.
While scores are relative to the highest-performing institution each year and are therefore not directly comparable over time, these changes provide an indication of the broader direction of performance for these institutions.
How important is return on investment in MBA rankings?
Return on Investment (ROI) is one of the strongest differentiators in the QS Global MBA Rankings 2027, showing the strongest relationship with annual overall score movement among the individual indicators analysed.
ROI accounts for 15% of the ranking methodology. Of the 423 ranked programmes, 121 fall within the high performance band (scores of 70–100), compared with 156 in the Mid-range band (40–below 70) and 146 in the low performance band (0–below 40).
These performance bands group programmes according to their indicator scores, providing a clearer picture of performance beyond ranking positions alone.
France records the strongest average ROI performance among locations with at least three programmes, while MIT Sloan achieves the highest individual score.
Changes in financial value also help explain some of the largest improvements in the 2027 rankings.
Lisbon MBA Católica|Nova climbed 19 places, supported by a 16-point improvement in ROI and a 14.9-point increase in its overall Value for Money category.
Western University's Ivey Business School recorded the largest annual improvement, rising 27 places to 66th. Its progress was supported by improvements in Employability (+6.6 points), Value for Money (+7.2 points) and Diversity (+6.5 points).
