Best Practices for International Data Officers: Data Analysis and Critical Reporting

Are your international data officers struggling to maintain and guarantee the integrity of your international data? Here’s what you need to know.  

International data officers face a range of challenges when managing and securing a higher education institution’s international data.  

These institutional challenges can include poor data interoperability, which results in data being misinterpreted as other departments and faculties may have a different understanding of the data. 

Another institutional challenge is the rework cost associated with the extensive manual process used for collecting and processing data. The rework cost of repeating the same procedure, the staff overtime and response times involved needs to be considered. 

These manual processes and poor data interoperability often lead to inaccurate or misleading data, which can taint the data-driven decision making on the institution’s executive level.  

This could result in the development of ineffective partnerships, the funding of poor investments, and reputational damage to international data officers and other university decision makers.  

It’s clear that bad data unnecessarily costs an institution valuable time and money. So, what can international data officers do to combat these challenges and implement best practices for quality data?  

Six best practices for quality data  

The first step that any international office needs to tackle is the centralization of all data into one single system, and an effective data quality strategy that dictates this system. 

Once all data lives in one system and a strategy is set, international data officers can follow these six best practices for data collection, data analysis, and critical reporting in a higher education institution. 

1. Completeness 

All data collected should be complete, with all mandatory fields filled inIncomplete data can skew results and lead to inconsistencies.  

2. Consistency 

Related to completeness, consistency means that data across all systems reflects the same information. All data should be in sync across the institution. 

3. Conformity 

When it comes to conformity, all data should follow a set of standard data definitions like data type, size, and format. 

4. Accuracy 

This is an obvious one! All data should be accurate, clearly reflecting what is happening across the institution.  

5. Timeliness 

This relates to whether international data officers and other university representatives can access and analyze data when they need it.  

6. Uniqueness 

Finally, each data record should be unique, otherwise the risk of accessing outdated information increases. 

If you’re an international data officer, or simply someone who works within the international office, it’s important to follow these best practices and ensure quality, accurate data at all times 

If you’d like to learn more about how to achieve quality data in your international office, download our free white paper: Optimizing International Strategy Using Data and Critical Reporting.

Summary
Best Practices for International Data Officers: Data Analysis and Critical Reporting
Article Name
Best Practices for International Data Officers: Data Analysis and Critical Reporting
Description
Are your international data officers struggling to maintain and guarantee the integrity of your international data? Here’s what you need to know.
Author
Publisher Name
QS - Quacquarelli Symonds
Publisher Logo
2019-12-12T17:29:05+01:00

About the Author:

As the B2B Content Marketing Manager, Sarah Linney is responsible for communicating the insights, research, and market analysis that have positioned QS as a thought leader in the higher education sector. After completing a Communications-Journalism degree at Charles Sturt University in Australia, Sarah worked in radio news and B2B print publishing before joining the content marketing sector. While working at a content marketing agency, Sarah was transferred to their New York office. She then led content marketing efforts at two tech startups in New York as a Content Manager before deciding to make the move to the UK and QS. 

Leave A Comment